Quote:
Originally Posted by soup
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let me reiterate my stance here:
The biggest mistake anyone made was when the group agreed to let the enchanter do a round then take over. They should have either told him to fuck off, or they should have agreed and let him actually have a chance at engaging the mob. Making the agreement then taking the camp anyway is where the douche baggery and lack of integrity comes from.
I'd also say that telling the enchanter to fuck off from the beginning would be much more inline with "Not being spineless and getting walked over" or however that was put earlier. Striking an arrangement then looking for any reason to convince themselves that the enchanter failed is when things went sour.
|
I agree with most of this, a deal should never have been made. If the group walked up, didn't say anything, and took the camp the first time the enchanter zoned, nothing would be wrong. If the enchanter did come make a post, he would, as someone else said, get laughed at.
Though, I don't think they made an agreement and then looked for "any way they could to take it from him." From what I gather from logs, they said he could have the next spawn. Then, the group notices that hes not even in the zone anymore. They discuss just killing the king, but someone even says, whatever lets clear the adds he can take the king. They see him zone AGAIN, and go well fucking-a, just kill the damn thing. They kill the thing, the enchanter comes and bitches, and they say ok well lets roll for it. The enchanter LOSES the roll, and comes to QQ on the forum instead of attempting to reach an officer of the guild in question.