Quote:
Originally Posted by soup
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
level 0
but making irrelevant assumptions about people is pretty cool I will admit
|
I would say it is a fairly relevant discussion and explain a lot of your poor logic here where you feel that:
- somehow an enchanter taking a camp from a CRing group with a melee character who could use the mith 2h is magically not a douchebag move
- somehow an enchanter is allowed to zone and maintain a camp despite clear rules that dictate you must retain a presence at a camp to claim it
- somehow a group that claims the camp after the enchanter zones and gives up his presence at the camp are the douchebags in this situation.
And I understand exactly where Nocte is coming from, because I've been in his place before. I don't want to spend my time on EQ arguing or fighting over digital pixels. It makes me sick to my stomach when a situation like this comes up, because no matter how closely you try to follow the rules we have for these things, someone is always going to try to twist the rules in their favor and try to make you look like the douchebag. But I think it's weak to sell out his group for being "greedy children" when all they were doing was being mindful of the rules and not being spineless doormats about it.