Thread: Drama
View Single Post
  #136  
Old 06-27-2010, 09:53 PM
soup soup is offline
Sarnak

soup's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Looks like the group were mindful of the rules the entire time and careful not to violate them. Shews gave up the camp when he zoned. Just like they gave up the camp when they left it and Shews moved in. And the whole ridiculous BS was making Nocte sick to his stomach, and I don't blame him.

Douchebag move to claim the camp after the enchanter zones?

Douchebag move for a solo caster to claim the camp after a group wipes and is doing CR?

Douchebag move to reneg on an agreement made by an enchanter who had the rights to the camp who then lost those rights when he zoned?

Douchebag move for a solo caster to go after phat lewts he can't even use over a group that I presume contains at least one melee who can?

Douchebaggery is all relative and subjective.

So we're left with the camping rules -- at least those can be quantified objectively. Lesson learned: if you want to maintain your camp, do not zone. Do anything BUT zone. Otherwise, you lose your camp. Unless the new made-up rule now is groups can zone out ad infinitum and retain their camps without being present at the camp.
Even Nocte, the cleric from the group, is saying his group acted like greedy children because the item in question was valuable, but you're STILL going on with this "HE ZONED HE LOST IT" shit.