View Single Post
  #405  
Old 02-26-2013, 06:40 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FTE was sniped from CT. It has always been allowable that a raid be allowed a measure of self preservation. I skirted this exact scenario (CT sniping) in this topic here: http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...659#post691659 several months ago.

In that particular case, TMO ran straight back to the north wall to camp. It is allowable that TMO return to the camp it had recently vacated in order to save lives. Otherwise, FTE sniping would have forced TMO to simply die (or face training suspensions) thus giving the competing force a free attempt at the mob. Either way you look at it, the snipe would be successful at preventing the original raid force's legitimate attempt.

FTE sniping carries an inherent risk, and that risk is when the original raid force disengages due to the snipers direct intervention.

If you can produce evidence that a TMO member ran far past TMO's camp in an unreasonable manner so as to negligently or purposefully train a rival force, then you have grounds for complaint. Otherwise, your FTE sniper removed any possible grievance you might have when he directly intervened in the encounter forcing a retreat.
this already happened and dosxx was suspended, confirmed cheaters. this is easy.