02-11-2013, 05:35 PM
|
|
Fire Giant
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kanada EH ?
Posts: 803
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ninja looting requires intent to defraud and dispossess the rightful owner. If it is proven that Eccezan looted the items with such intent knowing full-well that he had no possible rights to them, then yes, he would deserve a ban.
I am naive for invoking decision theory and reasoned analysis yet you yourself say "not likely." How is this any different? For the third time, I deny no outcomes, I only claim that a specific outcome appears far more likely in my eyes. Perhaps you should parse your own thoughts before you inadvertently declare yourself naive again.
|
Here is my Decision Theory:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
+
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
=
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad
Cuteguy: A thousand proxies of the botnet empire descend upon you! Our spam will blot out the sun!
MassiveMarc: Then we will poopsock in the shade.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr
Vox was tanked by hughman in plain sight, we found out that the bard could attack tru the wall there(more lucky than exploit) and we just pilled everyone there.
|
|
|
|
|