I love how the old 'Please don't derail this thread' excuse comes out as a defence.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Belief in the christian god (a supernatural being) is by definition a belief in the supernatural. I'm not attributing any connotations here.
I'm not criticising his belief here, just pointing out the glaring logical disparity of believing in one supernatural, unprovable force and simultaneously criticising belief in a different, equally plausible supernatural, unprovable force on the grounds of its supernatural, unprovable nature.