Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocturne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well it's been proven that thoughts can affect reality so it could be possible. Another thing to note is that certain zodiac signs are notoriously lucky compared to others. Sagittarius is the luckiest of the signs for sure but any of the fire signs(Aries, Leo's) are also notoriously lucky.
|
Have links to these studies?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocturne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Eh the Zodiac couldn't possibly be more accurate. Read a detailed profile for your zodiac sign some time. Most people associate astrology with shitty horoscopes in newspapers when it is actually far deeper then that. Also, as a Sagittarius myself I can attest to the fact that I am far luckier then most people.
p.s. nice post count, I can tell you're doing big things!
|
Which version of the Zodiac? The original or the revised modern one since it was out of sync?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocturne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You speak of Occam's razor like it's an infallible law. There are some things science was just not meant to quantify. I just know from personal experience that things like astrology and karma are real things. I guess some things you have to experience in order to actually understand them.
|
Occam's Razor isn't a law, it is a principle and is used until a more sophisitcated explanation can be derived from study. What is science not meant to quantify? What are your personal anecdotes that cause you to rely on astrology and karma?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocturne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
What is there besides science to derive understanding of the universe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocturne
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sorry but which label does sitting in a near freezing cold room, wrapping yourself with cold water, heating them to the point they are completely dry, fall under? That clearly has nothing to do with strength, acrobatics nor flexibility. So just a parlor trick then?
In fact both video's I linked clearly demonstrate feats beyond any of prescribed labels you presented. I guarantee that none of the feats in those video's can be achieved without highly extensive knowledge of chi and how to use it. These monks have demonstrated superhuman capabilities and attribute it to chi and I've yet to see anyone else able to do anything close to what they are capable of, without the use of chi.
|
I wouldn't call NatGeo television shows reliable evidence of anything.
This guy lol.