Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraftwerk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Glad you took time out of your day to troll a valid topic in Server Chat forum.
Stating something is wrong or flawed without support or reasoning =/ an argument or discussion. Keep attempted flames out of this thread unless you are going to actually support your claims not just make them and vanish.
|
Well, I actually had a well thought out reply but I jumped the gun and hit the first line, I'm at work, I read these forums leisurely until a call comes in.
I'll go ahead and opt not to post what I had spent the last 20 mins writing, because it obviously will fall on deaf ears.
In short, any system is better than no system at all, this is true. However, which system is chosen is best decided by the guilds who are doing the targets day in and day out. Something the leadership should decide on. A de facto system is already in, its just not really anything, anyone likes. I also propose a FFA system, a chaotic harmony if you will, so that the deciding factors, the ones who kill the targets, can gain much needed perspective to see what they would rather be doing.
It will give a chance for the guilds attempting these targets to see that a compromise must be met or continued conflict will result. Temporary anarchy is usually a good thing for things such as this. Pain, or wasted time/loss of items, is needed to have a clear unbiased union for all parties.
Something like this should not be enforced by the server staff either, it should be community based, as it was in classic.