Quote:
Originally Posted by Erebus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You ought to stop trying to claim that certain things function in p1999 because they are "as intended" in classic and just say its because thats how they are intended in p1999. How can anyone presume to grasp what ultimate goal was fully intended, and what implementations, although intended, didn't function in a properly intended manner on classic?
|
Well, on a case by case basis, it's often easy to presume. Coding an entire experience system to perform in a certain manner is presumed intended.
Whereas a bug which duplicates money was likely not purposely coded to perform in that manner.
I suppose I put myself in a position to judge the differences and people can choose whether or not to like my decisions. I certainly can not make everyone happy.