Quote:
Originally Posted by falkun
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did not say Ambrotos was not Bisch. But you, as a TMO member, are the one with the conspiracy theory about Ambrotos GM favoritism. If the server staff felt Ambrotos was being an unfair GM, nilbog/Rogean would have had Ambrotos removed, much like Amelinda stepping down. You are creating a GM favoritism conspiracy theory without evidence. Pot - kettle - black.
BDA has taken a more active role in the raid scene, we are in agreement there. But how does us commenting on FE getting a kill over TMO equate to our "desire to play being based on pissing people off and getting satisfaction from it." Even you contend "FE is not competition", so if FE is getting targets over TMO, that's a big accomplishment for FE. And I know more mains in FE than TMO that need the loot, so I AM glad when FE gets a kill over TMO. But that doesn't alter my desire to play, nor the desires of my guildmates.
Finally, please explain how "casuals quitting en masse" has anything to do with your previous argument. Casuals at all levels phase in and out of the game due to IRL constraints and other reasons. Thankfully, our charter recognizes the real world and we adapt with the members we have.
|
The proof was in the raid rules and decisions Ambrotos made. Remember that Trak where he stopped the raid right before his deployment? If you think nilbog or rogean were actively investigating GM's you are highly confused (see Amelinda/Cyrius/Hobby/Xzerion etc.) \
Secondly, if you are glad FE gets a kill you would say something along the lines of Grats FE or good for them, but you (meaning your guild) chooses to say, "at least TMO didn't get it". This demonstrates a attitude that receives pleasure when TMO was denied something. This obviously relates to taking pleasure in others misfortune.
Your casuals aren't phasing out... they are phasing to other guilds. You also have a few apps that members such as yendor are accusing of being TMO spies. Seems BDA caught a VD.