Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
Now, let's apply the term military weapons to what existed primarily back in those times. Cannons and Firearms.
Both are perfectly legal to own.
|
But the Constitution doesn't
say that. It says we have the right to bear arms.
It doesn't limit what arms we can keep...and the courts have surmised what they
might have meant, but no one has clarified what they
did mean.
Any argument either way is really opinion. Just as much as it's my
opinion people shouldn't carry semi-automatic or other "assault" style weapons. I've never said otherwise.
Until we clarify it all...what we do have the right to carry is pure conjecture.