Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why do that and not legally define what arms we can bear under the Constitution?
Banning "harsh language" is a further encroachment on the First Amendment whereas a clear legal definition of the Second isn't an encroachment at all.
And...a clear legal definition of what your rights under the Constitution regarding the Second Amendment are will better help protect them.
Right?
|
Mainly because the weapons of today may not be the weapons of tomorrow, or are you forgetting your argument as to why the 2nd doesn't need to apply today like it did when they wrote it.