Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why is it a straw-man?
Why doesn't the Constitution allow me to have whatever "arms" I want? Am I supposed to infer that legitimate legislation should define what "arms" are reasonable?
Isn't that infringement?
Show me what "arms" I'm allowed to bear under the Constitution.
|
Yes we get your point. . . Obviously there is a line to be drawn somewhere between firearms that are practical for the general public to own and those that are not. The debate is where. Some say that line is at walmart rifles with plastic addons that makes them look assaulty, others disagree. "Why don't you interpret laws 100% word-for-word??" isn't really an argument, it's just an attempt to look witty.