Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Weak sauce. Don't make me go digging for US statistics for firearm killings that included at least 2 killed and 5 injured. Just from 2006-2010 alone, USA TODAY identified 156 murders that met the FBI definitions of mass killings, where four or more people were killed. All told, the attacks killed 774 people, including at least 161 young children. I'd hate to see what less restrictive rules on what constitutes a mass killing does for our figures.
|
Sorry to disappoint, but this conversation is becoming old for me as all I am doing is moderating and not even arguing my opinions on the matter. I am much more interested on discerning what pick-up lines have the highest probability of success on targeted female audiences.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's what you accused me of earlier. An inherently flawed what-if argument.
|
Not quite. Mine was an extrapolation on the mentality of a psychopath given certain constraints. It is also observed often and can be noted by the saying "there is more than one way to skin a cat." Your argument was changing the past of a very specific instance and using the difference between the divined results and the actual results as the basis for your argument. Do you see the difference?