Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You still don't understand statistics. It is enough information to show violent crime rates in Britain for one year. But not enough years to demonstrate a trend.
Do you even understand what statistic you are trying to represent? You are trying to link a law to the effect on violent crime. The fact that crime may or may not have increased for one year is not relevant.
How can you possibly not understand this. You lost the moment you started.
|
Dude, you can't be serious. The statistics I gave you show official numbers, year over year, for a multi-year period. I realize you are trying to change the topic or divert attention away from your ignorance with the 'learn stats!!1!' stuff but you are only further proving out that you are out of your element.
Look, the reality is that you have a basic understanding of statistics and you must have just finished an intro to stats class based on what you posted so far. Call me back when you finish college or take a more advanced class that moves beyond sample sizes, distributions, binomials, correlations, etc. I understand that you think you are smart from the class you have taken but once you take some 300/500 level statistics and analysis classes and then learn how to apply it to be able to be on the same page, the conversation would be more fruitful.
In the meantime, you are still wrong from a raw-data perspective.