View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:58 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sooo... Actual reported crime rates for a year by the entire population of Britain is not a large enough sample size to represent the population of Britain? Uhh.. What? Just give it up, admit you are wrong and then swallow a Frisbee man.

I must be 'cherry picking' the data that is applicable to the discussion we were having instead of quoting arbitrary data that may help support my cause but is not relevant to the discussion. I don't know how you guys do math down in western Florida or what they taught you in the Navy, but come on... You lose. It's ok to admit it.. It might actually feel good.
You still don't understand statistics. It is enough information to show violent crime rates in Britain for one year. But not enough years to demonstrate a trend.

Do you even understand what statistic you are trying to represent? You are trying to link a law to the effect on violent crime. The fact that crime may or may not have increased for one year is not relevant.

How can you possibly not understand this. You lost the moment you started.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.