Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well that's very different, and doesn't put you at odds with the Founding Fathers. They supported the right to bear arms -- not the right to own an arsenal of AK-47s.
I believe a person has a fundamental right to self defense. Sufficient weaponry to protect oneself is a necessary extension of such a right.
But where the bounds of 'sufficient weaponry' end is a matter of legitimate debate. Obviously, things like grenades and mines do not qualify. Neither should automatic weaponry. I think extended magazines should absolutely be on the table for a possible ban. You have a right to defend yourself, not a right to be Rambo.
|
So I don't have to move to Australia after all?
Sweet!