Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitchens
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
@Daldoma,
I would not advocate for a blanket gun ban. I just don't think certain guns should be in the hands of civilians merely for the sake of protection against a tyrannical government when the guns in the hands of civilians wouldn't really stop a tyrannical government.
This doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
|
Well that's very different, and doesn't put you at odds with the Founding Fathers. They supported the right to bear arms -- not the right to own an arsenal of AK-47s.
I believe a person has a fundamental right to self defense. Sufficient weaponry to protect oneself is a necessary extension of such a right.
But where the bounds of 'sufficient weaponry' end is a matter of legitimate debate. Obviously, things like grenades and mines do not qualify. Neither should automatic weaponry. I think extended magazines should absolutely be on the table for a possible ban. You have a right to defend yourself, not a right to be Rambo.