Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemmy
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wait. I made a statement. You refuted it with [a bunch of words]. You cannot now seriously be asking me to back up stuff I have said in response to your [talking a lot] without backing up what you originally said.
You then even go so far as to ask me to prove the thing I'm asking you.
So, I ask you again sir. When has this happened before?
My postulation is "I doubt it ever has." That was the point of the OP, and something YOU have argued with. I'm eagerly awaiting your response.
Actually I'm going to bed. I may or may not have more to say to the other post tomorrow night, but that depends on if the girl puts out.
|
My response is that bail conditions routinely restrict the freedom of association, and freedom of political affiliation isn't substantively different from freedom of association. In other words, it happens literally every day. To that end, freedom of association is no more or less important than other basic civil rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of movement. All of these are subject to restriction under the terms of a bail agreement. This is not a special snowflake.
Good luck with the sex.