Quote:
Originally Posted by Massive Marc
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm quite happy with the way things are here. Clearly, you're not. My point, which flew over your head, was that, it's a slippery slope when you start changing classic elements based on subjective reasoning.
These elements were in classic, this server strives to be classic in every way possible. This isn't hard to comprehend. Talk about low intelligence, do a fucking search and see how this topic has been beaten to death and every retarded suggestion (like your novel length post) has been thrown out the window.
Again, and this is very simple, If you want a Classic Server with custom elements (ie: MQ removed, powerleveling removed and whatever other wacked ideas you have) then you need to build your own.
Use your fucking head.
If you're aware of a exploit or bug, post it in the bug section, otherwise, gtfo.
|
All 4 are exploits or bugs. Not even debatable Against intent of developers - hence exploit/bug.
I do not want to change anything that isn't an exploit or bug. If I did, I would not have come to this server. I hate what EQ changed into, which was obvious had you read my entire post. It was novel length because some people don't fathom the idea that EQ itself is an evolution of an existing game. The entire genre would not exist if not for role players.
Why so angry? Could it be that you are afraid of having to actually play the game as it was intended instead of using every cheat/trick you can find? Classic EQ also had items disappear in tradeskills if you made a mistake - want that back?
I don't mind a discussion, or even conceding points. But the stronghest argument the few of you have is that the things I mention were in classic EQ. But you're fine with taking other bugs out that AID your levelling/xp.
You're either trolling or just can't understand logic. The other people aside form the on random guy that spit out 4 useless words, all made logical, rational arguments. You can't answer the one I asked. Do you wants bugs fixed? If so, that's not true classic either, and invalidates your entire argument.