Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinlulz
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
#1 you're racist coz u used "collateral damage" to euphemize "dying children."
#2 it's racist to point out the tragedy of a group of white kids dying when you don't point out the tragedy of groups of brown kids dying all the time as a matter of course.
#3 your intentional ignorance of the fact that many of the people that do the actual killing of the children are funded by us isn't funny.
|
dumb.
Your distracting from the tragedy of 20 slaughtered American children does nothing to help slaughtered brown children. If you care, do something about it. Being a jackass in RnF satisfies your need for attention and nothing else.
And yet again, even including "brown kids" 7,000 miles away, instances of the intentional murder of 20 children under the age of 10 are rare. When and where it does happen, it's typically not available to media and thus not capable of being conveyed via media in human terms. People read about a tally a month later. That wouldn't have the same effect even if they were white Americans.
Kids dying of hunger, unintentionally in the midst of a war, or in separate, more spread out incidents is just as tragic for the children, but significantly less dramatic for a viewing public.
But the major factor is intent. These were 6-10 year olds intentionally executed en masse at short range, and the public was able to watch the immediate aftermath. Comparable situations with children of any skin color are few and far between.