Quote:
Originally Posted by Hailto
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you determine ahead of time how much loot will drop, and how long the group stays together, to make sure everyone gets something? Please explain how you do this. You still haven't explained how complete randomness is biased or unfair as well.
|
on the first page of this post the last post explains it exactly and its not even by me. the reason i say its unfair is 1 person shouldnt have the ability to win all the loot if it goes down like that or not. if someone wins a greed roll they should be out for the next greed roll pending on how much it is if a item drops worth more than the one they already got and they win they hand the item previously won to the 2nd highest roller ect. new members get pushed to the back of the que like alpha on gems. in this situation everyone has a chance to actually win something by increasing the % chance of winning by removing someone who already won something from the roll. People who think they deserve to win 2 or 3 times when other won nothing were always considered loot whores. simple as that. i shouldnt even have to say that you should feel bad if you win 3 things and someone who been in the group as long as you or longer wins nothing. thats why i say its a matter of "principles" I'm not really trying to offend anyone im just trying to make a fair point in this insanity because im pretty sure everyone who played live knows greed all isnt a fair system. when i played live this system worked like clockwork there was never people bitching about being unfairly dealt with.