Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinlulz
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For the record, this is probably the most snobbish elitist correction I have ever fucking heard. Get the fuck over yourself. LMAO.
I think it does, he invented probability out of thin air in an attempt to explain what he does not know. It's the exact same reasoning as god of the unknowns, you fucking prick, and it's ironic that he used it in that way in this argument. KMA lol
|
Dude.
The god of the gaps fallacy is basically this: science doesn't know everything, therefore god must exist. If anything, Alarti's error is exactly the opposite: we've never found a higher intelligence, therefore we probably won't find a higher intelligence. The most applicable fallacy is probably hasty generalization. A much stronger argument is to say that we don't have any evidence of any higher intelligence and that belief in a higher intelligence is wishful thinking.
You used a mangled phrase for something that doesn't apply. That doesn't make me an asshole; It makes you an ignorant blowhard, but we already knew that.
Btw, nice ad hominems and cursing. You mad bro?