Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Of course it's reasonable to consider I am not correct. There are an infinite number of possibilities that can be considered, but only the ones that come with verifiable evidence are worth considering. What is unreasonable is ignoring evidence for one argument in favor of another argument that has no evidence or anecdotal evidence which is the same as no evidence since it is not verifiable.
|
"A subject being worth considering" and "a subject being wrong because of lack of evidence" are two different things.