[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is the following irrational?

A man examines all available scripture, historical sites and artifacts, and conducts a sweeping review of prophecy both supposedly "passed" and that yet to occur. He personally finds that it is more likely than not that these revelations and discoveries are authentic.

No, it is entirely rational. He has what he considers a proper set of evidence and makes a decision to believe. At no point is he playing with blind faith. He has evidence that, in his view, satisfies the proper burdens. He is believing based upon his evidentiary conclusions. When you walk into a room for the first time and turn on the light switch, you expect that it is more likely than not that the lights will come on. That is a rational belief supported by your experiences and understanding of reality.

The belief is rational. Don't hide the ball by switching rational belief with faith.

Lucky: I suspect that you will be far more persuasive in your efforts and appeals if you quit abusing people with expletives and exasperations.

No its not reasonable, you need testable evidence to develop a proper conclusion. Belief isn't reasonable.