View Single Post
  #32  
Old 10-02-2012, 02:35 PM
Slave Slave is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,339
Default

Here's something that will put it into perspective: ask literally any Druid or Wizard who's played more than a few months how many groups they get. And they'll probably tell you they don't deserve them, either.

Because Druid and Wizard are not grouping classes. At all. They are probably the worst two classes for a group when compared to almost any replacement.

You're asking for advice? Well, the original group makeup is not going to be viable at higher levels with a Druid and Wizard taking up critical slots, without a Cleric and devoted slower. You will not gain experience in anything like a fun and efficient fashion.

The Bard and Druid are absolutely not capable of decently healing the party after level 40, period. The Bard will be primary target of any mob that he begins slowing, and you have no snap-aggro tank to take it off him. Your warrior is nothing but DPS at that point (or the mob is unslowed), you will have insufficient heals on a low-HP and low-AC tank because you have no good buffs... the list goes on.

It is an extremely problematic group makeup at any level over 39, in my opinion.

If the Druid became a Cleric and the Wizard became a Rogue, it would be a very STRONG group, conversely.