I've been trying to reduce your argument to standard form and it's really difficult because your logic is so fucking twisted, but it goes something like this:
Reikerz is a member of "the board."
Reikerz states that all person who are members of "the board" know that Alawen and Hasbinbad are fucked up.
Therefore, Alawen and Hasbinbad are fucked up.
It's a disaster. "The board" is not a cohesive entity and Reikerz was never elected to speak for that non-existent entity. Stripped of those problems with premise, we are left with this:
All persons who are members of the board know that Alawen and Hasbinbad are fucked up.
Therefore, Alawen and Hasbinbad are fucked up.
This is a very direct example of the fallacy of argumentum ad populum.
Quick, call me a virgin or something, because you're straight up wrong on this one.
|