Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Top guild would log out buffed at atleast one raid mob (maybe more) before server comes down.
top guild would batphone when the server came down to have everyone ready to log in.
top guild would zerg desired raid mobs as soon as server comes up.
all other guilds would lose 100% of the time.
people can complain about variance sucking all they want. fact is, they are arguing against their best interests unless they are in the top guild.
|
I actually had to re-read Lostprophets's post to see if you and him were talking about the same thing. Not trying to sound rude, but you do realize that server repops currently happen every time there's a patch, and that smaller guilds historically have much more success than with varianced spawns? I refer you to the example of last night where there was a full repop and we got Inny and Maestro, which is probably 2 more mobs than we would have gotten if we were resorting to poopsocking and pressing the track button for 96 hours. Sure we still get less mobs than TMO, but we also have about 1/4 of the raid force, so I'll take 2 mobs over none any day. I can't think of any full repop on this server (out of at least a dozen that have happened) where we didn't either get mobs, or get attempts at mobs - one time we even got VS which is pretty much impossible for a casual guild to do when he's on variance. You can try to argue that variance benefits smaller guilds, but there's this thing called "empirical evidence" that would like to have a word with you.