Quote:
Originally Posted by falkun
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Picked, I am glad you and your guild had a positive experience with TMO, but please do not assume TMO treats all raid targets equal or all guild competition with equal cordiality. I assume you are referring to this incident?
|
Yes that is the incident. And TMO wouldn't have had a choice in the matter had we had the force there to kill it. We had already engaged and wiped to Draco before there was even a TMO in the zone, (other than the tracker that was there before the pop of course) while we were recovering from the first wipe is when TMO started to show outside. Had we had a little more umph we would have got the kill without any interference at all. And I'm sure if a guild became competitive with TMO on stuff they wouldn't be this lenient. I'm just saying that there are options to getting named targets if you are truly willing to go the extra mile.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarathiel
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
dude you are missing the point of this thread, we all know how to track and kill mobs and what it takes to compete against tmo. this is NOT a " lets whine about tmo" thread. you are absolutely correct, if a guild wants a mob they have to track it and place the force there to engage it. the point of this thread is to discuss whether doing this for 96 hours per mob is still necessary
|
Ya I guess I did miss the point. I was under the impression that you were wanting the variance of mob spawns to be further apart giving more time between mob spawns so that sitting on top of a spawn would be rather fruitless. I am sorry for the confusion.