Quote:
Originally Posted by theaetatus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This part deems a response at least, as it rather illuminates your position. You equate talent with physical fitness again; do you consider someone that runs from A to B 0.1 second faster than 10,000 other people doing the same more talented than, for instance, someone who can put forward new philosophical or scientific theories?
Is 'talent' where you're from purely a physical thing?
|
why do you never attempt to address the full content of his post, yet nitpick at things that he probably got right about you personally? At least square can insult you while making coherent and relevant arguments at the same time.
It's ok though, most fools have trouble double tasking.