Quote:
Originally Posted by Loli Pops
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Vanilla WoW sans BGs
|
I dunno, WSG/AB/AV all had their moments and were a ton of fun. The later BGs just didn't do it for me. PvP without BGs just becomes gang warfare, which isn't as fun for a pseudo-casual player who just wants to PvP every now and then on a fairly even plane.
AV as a hunter was some of the most fun I ever had, although I really felt Alliance had a much better layout (all versions). AB and WSG were flat awesome, esp if you had 2 or 3 RL friends to team up with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i laugh at people who says wow class balance > eq.
As besta tester i did have a clue about what was wow before the launch and wich class was the best suited dps heal and kill other players.
i did pick a enhacement orc shaman while most go tauren, when u single handle killed ten alliance players of your same level without troubles thanks to windfury and that crafted axe was priceles.
|
So did you actually play after Beta? Doesn't sound like you did.
Windfury was really strong, but frost shock was much more a pain in the A for alliance before DRs were implemented, so if you're pointing at windfury as an example of no class balance, you've already lost.
The very proposition that "WoW class balance was just as bad or worse than EQ's" is laughable from the start. I'm sorry, if you don't see it i'm not going to bother to explain it.