Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclanz
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Falk, you know as well as I that twinking was uncommon and powerleveling was rare back in the day.
|
False. Twinking was highly common and I leveled my main, Falkun, during Kunark & Velious with many twinked rerolls/alts. However, there was also a larger EQ population, so you had a lot of new characters as well. You probably have a similar proportion of old/new players here on P99, but since the concurrent server population is 500 instead of 3000, its more noticeable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclanz
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I do agree that wiping the server is a bad idea; I want those pixel hogs to stay on that server; so the rest of us can play on the new server.
|
TMO doesn't play to win pixels, they play to be the best at the server. If this was their own private box, they'd get bored and leave quickly. But because they have other persons to keep down, it remains fun for them. Examples:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
End scene. Gwence basically said if velious came out before TMO started competeing then IB would have have been #1done in velious. You guys are only #1 if there is no #2,3,4 etc.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1) Sorry, didn't see you on the battlefield.
2) They were always there. I seriously doubt any more training is happening than before when I played against IB. If it did, you'd not even be able to log on without dying to one.
3)Server rotation does not equal competition. Me and a few others have already expressed ways to make the raiding better without a rotation. They've all been ignored or forgotten and pushed aside. Also, what makes you think I want the "easy way out" with no "competition"? I have fought more for my place on the server than 99% of p99 thank you very much.
Pretty sure Rogean stated publicly on the boards that a server rotation would never be put in.
ps - you're welcome for the Ragefire agreement. Where most of you bitched and complained, a select few put forth the effort to get it started and made sacrifices you'll never know.
|
A new server is not the answer. A wipe is not the answer. More concurrent content (so you can't lockdown boss_A and then move to boss_B) is the answer. General server consensus is the answer. More concrete rules & mechanics that do not require CSR intervention are the answer.