Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain1
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Obama wins, to quote "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." Romney just chose Ryan, so this election will prove if women are truly dumb and subjugated or not. If you believe in equal pay for a woman (which I do) doing the same exact fucking job you are doing, you would vote Obama. (not that I agree on him being president, i think Mark Warner of Va, the epitome of "CENTER," should have been appointed the job years ago: He declined). If you would like a return to the "good ol' days" of women in the kitchen/household/pregnant you would vote Romney. If you disagree with my statement, why have Republican dominated legislatures voted down/removed "equal pay" laws? Just curious as to what the defense is for women getting paid less than men. I just don't get it.
-Rainmon
|
I'm not quite sure where your perception that equally qualified women are not paid the same compensation as equally qualified men. In my experience, most initial compensation packages are based on a pre determined formula which takes only experience and education into account; not gender. From there, it all depends on negotiation skills.
If Obama does get elected again, pay won't really make a difference for those of us that actually work for our money. He will simply continue taking money from those of us that produce and redistribute it to those who do not in the form of entitlement programs.
Oh, and if you prefer a Nanny State approach, Obama is certainly your guy! For those of us that actually prefer freedom and believe in limited government as it was intended, then ABO (anybody but Obama) is the way to go.
DISCLAIMER! This post was typed up on my mobile phone so don't be a petty ass and try to grill me on any possible spelling errors! TY!