Quote:
Originally Posted by Slathar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i dont give a fuck about either of those shows. i watch neither. i don't care if someone is conservative or liberal because they're essentially the same thing in the united states of amerikkka.
all i said is that you're just repeating something you saw on television. i don't care about your political leanings. i find your primitive brain amusing. and it isn't critical thinking if you're just repeating something you saw on a television show.
|
FYI it's just a coincidence if Fox was saying what I'm saying. The internet is erupting with the same thinking all over the place. You think it all stems from a cable news channel?
What they're not saying is what I'm most concerned about
: the precedent this sets. This case will be used to judge future cases, and the court just gave the government the power to do almost anything it wants by taxing. So what if it can't use the commerce clause? It can just impose a tax. Want to force the people to buy something? Penalize them with a tax, the Supreme Court allows it.
It's the precedent that's the problem here, and it's not being talked about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Since this is a "tax" will the (taxed enough already) TEA party finally revolt?? I got some wal-marts to be lootin
|
Through the vote, through the vote. It started in about 2009 and it will be ramped up in the next few months. This is seriously angering a lot of people.
Know what else is not being talked about? What the medicaid decision means. States don't have to add all these new low income people to their medicaid rolls now. That was going to be accomplished by penalizing them for not complying but that's not allowed now. States can just say "no", and then what?