Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowWulf
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very well, then lets play it your way.
Why? Who should weed be exempt, or even reclassified as a food additive (the only currently existing alternative btw, like nicotine and caffeine). You just agreed with the addictive statement by another poster on weed, remember. That i do not agree with myself btw, ONLY the psychological dependence, not physical has been proven.
Peop
|
Can you please retype this in a fashion that makes any sense so I can respond.
Quote:
|
The argument on people not calling tobacco a drug is also flawed, because I have yet to meet one person who did not in some way acknowledge tobacco and nicotine were a drug.
|
Well maybe you haven't, but to deny there aren't people out there who will look down on you for smoking weed while they take down a pack of cigarettes a day is ignorant.
Quote:
|
You also seem to misrepresent the argument at hand, so I ask again why exactly did this touch a cord in you?
|
Haha.. yes.. Im misrepresenting it..
Quote:
Professionally we do not treat nicotine as we do crack, nor caffeine. Are they all addictive? Yes.
But that argument is inherently flawed sir presidente. Is a heart attack as fatal as a gun shot wound? Yes, it can be, circumstances depending im sure. Do you treat them differently? Yes. Yet they both remain medical conditions.
|
I wasn't saying we do, you are the person who is only bringing in addiction into the argument when there are many other factors that go into drug classification.
Seriously dude, start making sense.