Quote:
Originally Posted by Dullah
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, pretend your silly suggestions haven't been rebutted and refuted into the ground
No one is against other 50s, we are however against unclassic additions to the game.
However, I think everyone would like to see some exp bonus days for newer players, but to pretend that kunark wouldn't be more beneficial than exp for the hundreds of inactive players that already leveled to 50 and competed over classic for the last 7 months is asinine.
|
And your "content" suggestion has failed worse than the EXP boost that is already in place.
You ask for content, people come back. We ask for EXP people come back. But no matter what, people will still quit logging in. WoW dies off between content patches. EQ dies off in between content patches. But you know what doesn't? The accelerated leveling experience. WoW has it. EQ has it. This server is NOT classic. Its classic feel. What is the huge problem with boosting EXP in a hot zone that's on a rotation? Are you afraid that if more people get to 50 you will have to compete over that Dragon kill?
I just don't understand the insane desire to not boost EXP. I thought the point of PvP was to brag about wrecking someones face? Not "OMG we killed Innoruk!" Or "The Spiroc Lord just got smoked!"
And PvP requires people. More people will come and stay if its easier (not EASY, but EASIER), to get up to the proper level of competition.
Just give me one good reason why a EXP boost is detrimental. And "kunark will bring more people" is not a valid response. Its irrelevant and has no bearing on why EXP boost is a bad thing.