Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruinous
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Someone questioned him, and again someone backed him up to confirm that this is how it works. Even in the face of answers you're too set about your ways to consider that you are incorrect. I'm perfectly willing to accept facts that disprove what we're claiming here, yet these replies are fruitless and full of insults. The only attempt to provide evidence otherwise was from President, and despite him being jackassy with how he went about confronting us on the matter, I give him credit for it. However the screenshots he gave prove exactly what we're fighting here... whether weapon skill/offense is the strict deciding factor of hit/miss chances - in which case MY stance is that it should not be.
I don't intend to argue the matter further with any regular players here. It takes very little intelligence to consider that while a low level 5 sucks with his weapon, it is adequate to fight a low level 1 who sucks even worse at avoiding being hit with it.
I shall continue to research the subject and provide more evidence for devs to consider. In the meantime, I encourage everyone else that seems hellbent on screaming that this system is "working as intended" as per live to provide their own proof.
|
My point wasn't about him being questioned, and whether or not someone backed him up. My point was this: that thread provides absolutely nothing but hearsay, just like every non-dev posting in this one, and based off your quoted post and attitude in this thread, that's probably all you're going to provide for your vaunted evidence. You provide absolutely no real proof yourself and urge others to provide something you KNOW is pretty much impossible to do considering how long ago it was, insult people whose view is different from your own and that never insulted you in the first place, and then take this holier than thou tone after doing it which is just laughable.
The devs can only work with what they have. The burden of proof is NOT on the people who say it is working as intended. The burden of proof is on the people who say something is broken. To fix a bug one must know EXACTLY what is wrong and how to replicate it if possible.