Yeah, Xasten, just about everything you just said sounds right to me. Admittedly, I also think that you're correct on what Rogean said: it looks to be pretty on point here, and it's all we have to go on. I only believe that he could not have meant the rule in his thread to apply literally and generally because the result would be nonsensical (e.g., the absurd VP training result I used as an illustration).
The only point you make that I take minor issue with is this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I rebut the dropped bag analogy because it has been explicitly recognized by the authorities as "at your own risk."
|
The fact that authorities have recognized bag dropping as an "at your own risk" activity isn't a reason to reject it as a valid analogy to the present case. The fact that it is an "at your own risk" activity is precisely why I think the two situations are parallel.
It's interesting that Amelinda later ruled practically the exact same scenario Raid Interference. I wasn't aware of that. I'd be curious to see what Rogean has to say about that, but likely it's just semantics at this point (in which case, only you, me, and maaaayyyybe Hitchens care).
But yeah, at this point, Hitchens is right. I think you and I now disagree on only minor points of opinion. I have nothing to say yours is any less correct than mine.