Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think this is done for the most part. There's been a few notable exceptions here and there, but most guilds are willing to I'd think. As I said earlier, aside from general trolling which can typically be safely ignored, most guilds will take action when presented with strong evidence or proof of a member's misdeeds.
|
This is pretty hilarious considering your guildleader has personally broken more raid rules than any person playing on this server and it's not even close. Revisionist history FTW!
Anyway, to the OP:
Simulated patch days have been brought up every few months since i started playing here. The case has been made ad nauseum. It would be more classic both in feel and actuality. It would be better for the community because smaller guilds would get a legitimate shot at raid mobs at least once a week, even if it was a fraction of what the big guys at the top get. It would slow down burnout of the raiders because there would be days off from tracking due to naturally occurring days with nothing in window.
It's all been said before, directly to them, in person and over the forums.
If simulated maintenance days wouldn't happen when there was active support from the project admins, they sure aren't happening now that those guys are absentee and splitting focus. It would require actual programming work by rogean or a manual tedious repop or each mob/zone. GL getting that kind of attention with 1.2 out last week.