[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow I got trolled hard. Seriously, I dismissed Heartbrand's idiotic suggestion because I knew if I explained myself thoroughly in terms that no reasonable person could possibly disagree with, I would just have people reply with one liners calling me a fag or a bluebie. I took the bait, wrote a 500+ word post, only for it to be responded with posts like this:



Sorry, in no world can you adequately respond to a 500 word post with a 40 word post. What I said still stands, unguilded players will get shit on the most. Even if there were only one unguilded player on the server, my point would be valid.

The rest of this post is just going to be flippant responses to one liners. Most of your opinions are worthless but I'll grace you with my presence in this thread one last time.



I should have expected that 500 words would be too long for a simpleton like you to understand. Why make logical arguments when you can just call someone a fag? With a staggering intellect like yours I'm surprised that you're stuck doing janitorial work.



Not true and irrelevant. Confirmed dumb.



Yeah I know right, it's such a stupid idea to think that rules can change people's behaviour. It's not like I made an empirical observation about something that actually happened on every other pvp server. Idiot.



Every other pvp server had a lower population than red99 (except vztz at its peak which had roughly the same population of non-boxers). The observations I made about how YT impacted those servers still holds, so the population argument is silly.



Bind camping unguilded players, or players not in rival guilds, will happen more if there's YT, for reasons I already mentioned. Bind camping players in rival guilds (by people who would normally choose not to bind camp), would also happen more, for reasons I already mentioned. Refer to my post on the first page which thoroughly demolished the case for YT.



I have a simple response to this: read my other post. There's more nuance to this other than, "people will grief more". They adopt different rules of engagement because the stakes for each pvp battle are higher (now they get publicly humiliated if they lose). This means that, at a minimum, you will see people attacking other players unprovoked more often to get that sweet high from being publicly recognized for killing someone in a video game. It's not bad that this behaviour exists, but it's bad if this behaviour is encouraged. Do you understand the difference now between what I'm saying, and what you think I'm saying?



lol! Good one. With the way you guys act it's a wonder the staff doesn't want to listen to your moronic suggestions.

One last thing, re: encouraging pvp. It's a pvp server: you don't need to encourage pvp. Everyone knows what they signed up for. ARGUMENT OVER.

Your entire post ignores the entire reality of this server. You created an argument based upon a reality that isn't accurate. Sick of debating with you, it's pointless, we heard your view, the poll since you are in the vast minority, thanks for stating it.