View Single Post
  #367  
Old 03-03-2012, 11:59 AM
Amelinda Amelinda is offline
VIP / Contributor

Amelinda's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Plane of Fear
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via AIM to Amelinda Send a message via Yahoo to Amelinda
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So even if you had FTE (you didn't, the second talendor shout is proof that the mob went into seek mode), those logs wouldn't exist after what Qadosx did.
this is true. and i've NEVER said there were encounter logs that support that you guys had FTE on that talendor, Alarti. The only thing that i might have said is that the encounter logs would show you guys as having FTE if the dragon had been memblurred.

Of course there are still people who think that I can see the encounter log for an NPC that didn't die on a previous encounter. Because they obviously don't listen to me. >.>

I will say that if someone uses memblur to try to snipe FTE and fuck up the encounter logs I am going to ladle out nice long suspensions. So don't do it.

Please don't misunderstand: I'm not saying that i'm going to suspend people for using it in VP to grief. that's a no GM involvement zone (for raid disputes) I wish people wouldn't use it but i won't say you can't.

That brings me to this point:

Twice this week I have told people not to do things in VP that are exploits. Both times the attitude i was met with was: "There is no GM involvement here. so we can exploit" I realize you are trying to be smart asses about the memblur thing. I don't really care. If I warn you about an exploit and tell you not to use it then the proper response is "Yes Amelinda." not, "BUT THERE IS NO GM INVOLVEMENT IN VP!"

[08:38] {Rogean} up to you, but at least one of those. GM Involvement is specific to raid disputes, it doesn't give them a pass on exploiting game mechanics