Quote:
Originally Posted by LordFresh
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OK Uthgaard man up! Tell us all! Word on the street that has been unconfirmed is that you told tiggles about the DDL file getting implimented but you didnt want to make it look like you said anything so slowly word got around to a couple of people in TMO about the file going live.
Confirm / Deny..
Ill take you on your word but tell the truth broseph
|
No. Loly actually figured out what it was by using common sense, I think I still have that convo. If they'd been warned they wouldn't have had any I'd think, or substantially less.
11:01:22 PM Loly: I heard some random stats, I'm not sure to the validity of them, but someone told me something like Divinity had the least banned, followed by TMO, nothing after that cept TR was like 8%. On the forums they act like I got the list
11:01:24 PM Loly: I did not
11:01:34 PM Loly: else I wuolda went on a crusade before this project
11:01:52 PM Uthgaard: it's true
11:02:25 PM Loly: I never warned any of them, I just said in guildchat it was suspcious like I alluded to on the forums on page one of that patch11:02:41 PM Loly: I am no genius, but I am not stupid
11:02:58 PM Loly: I spelled genious wrong too
11:03:00 PM Loly: my god.
11:03:46 PM Loly: and honestly had no idea what it did
11:03:52 PM Loly: other than disassembling it
11:03:54 PM Loly: and seeign
11:04:02 PM Loly: process calls, get active window calls
11:04:11 PM Loly: none of that was in wsock32.dll
11:04:23 PM Loly: I am a reverse engineer, I just compare
11:04:36 PM Loly: some dude name kobias told me it was a dll injector
11:04:41 PM Loly: and I was like, yew sure?
11:04:58 PM Loly: and he was like yeah, nothing like mq2 detection or anything like that if that's what you wanted to know.
11:05:22 PM Loly: and I was like ya w/e, I don't care, I was just curiously suspicious
11:05:33 PM Uthgaard: shit, anyone with the sense god gave a gopher suspected what they did
11:05:37 PM Uthgaard: it didnt matter one bit
11:05:45 PM Uthgaard: people gambled correctly
11:05:58 PM Loly: for the record, never used anything like that, as proved
11:06:00 PM Loly: I knew before that
11:06:04 PM Loly: they had detection methods
11:06:14 PM Loly: it was a packet
11:06:18 PM Loly: that would crash MQ users
11:06:20 PM Uthgaard: yeah, it wasn't like it suddenly went from unable to tell, to able to tell
11:06:22 PM Loly: but not legit users
11:06:27 PM Uthgaard: it was just a more involved process before that