My stance comes from wanting GM's to interfere as little as possible with gameplay situations where reprecussions can happen by the players with politics and action within the game.
Hate and Ruin and later Hate by itself thrived even with Speedd doing his best to ruin every raid he could.
Anything that puts regulating bad behavior into the hands of the players and out of the hands of gm's is a step forward in my book. Anything to reduce petitions, and reduce a "judge" hearing both "sides" and making a "decision". Talk about horsecrap.
Players on Sullon gravitated towards anti training guilds when they wanted to avoid training. Other players joined in on the games.
Really makes sense to have GM's spend hours volunteering serving as mediator between a couple of whiney ass lying parties.
|