Quote:
Originally Posted by fischsemmel
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pros of latter relative to former group: Tank has better aggro, more hp, more damage, SK spells, FD-pull potential, troll regen, slam. Ranger has an interesting mix of dps, tanking, and cc potential, though shouldn't really be relied on for any one of them too heavily. Barbarian rogue has better damage and slam compared to halfling rogue. Bard is tough to nail down... potentially allows ench to do massive dps with charm, significantly increases party mana and hp regen, and fills in a bunch of little gaps in CC, debuffing, buffing, and maybe DPSing.
Which group is better overall? Can you tell? Because I sure can't.
|
Warriors have more hp and dps then a shadow knight, and a good warrior doesn't have a problem with aggro with two rogues as the primary dps. I feel that hybrid tanks aren't that big of a deal in groups. I'd rather be killing with a hybrid tank then not killing without one. I, personally, always check for a warrior first, but never hesitate to invite a PAL or SK if they are what is available.
This isn't a race bonus conversation, it's a class one, so why bring up barbarian vs halfling rogue? Each group has an enchanter, tank, rogue and cleric, so we can call them a wash. So it becomes Rogue Shaman vs. Bard Ranger. Can you tell the difference, cause I sure can.