View Single Post
  #7  
Old 04-26-2010, 06:35 AM
BuzWeaver BuzWeaver is offline
Kobold

BuzWeaver's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Posts: 189
Send a message via AIM to BuzWeaver Send a message via Yahoo to BuzWeaver
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slayde [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm not being critical either. I was just trying to say that the thought of clicking a mouse, no matter how many times, being physically taxing to the point of hindering or discouraging people from doing tradeskills, is just being lazy. Nobodies finger is going to fall off because they have to click a few more times on the mouse. Thats all im trying to say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its awesome when we make things more classic, people complain. You guys should complain if we for example... put Vah Shir in the game.

If you'll notice, the changes we implement are to fit the mission goal of the project. Classic Everquest. Stupid indeed.
Perhaps the idea of functionality is being obscured by nostalgic conceptualization. Personally I can modify my play style, the idea that excessive clicking is somehow attributed to laziness is clearly off the mark and borders on pure cynicism. Repetitive motion is repetitive motion its either static to none static.

I can't speak for others as far as complaints, simply because I appreciate the fact that there isn't a monthly fee and a lot of work went into the concept. I would agree if Vah Shir were in the game it would detract from the original game, however repetitive motion was something that was discussed in the original game.