Quote:
Originally Posted by Torven
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That log suggests premeditation. Going after Nag with such a weak force to begin with is highly suspicious. Pulling Nag very far from his spawn point instead of using the nearest corner. The very little healing. The bard melee. The water pet from the get go. The not aborting the pull even when two pet casters are dead.
Everything seems to indicate that Nag never AoEed at all, not half-way through the fight as they claim.
|
They already admitted they knew of the problem, reported it, waited for GM response which they didn't get...and proceeded to kill Naggy anyway. I don't know that I'd have done differently in that situation.
As far as I know they didn't do it again. If they had they'd be as wrong as Holo.