You're arguing a detriment to the promisee via forbearance to establish consideration, but in this case there was no detriment to Lovely. Pretty sure that nerd was going to no-life the box whether there as a deal or not, nothing to indicate he acted in reliance on Cast's promise either.
I feel like this case is VERY easy to crush my pretty obvious troll, but you're doing it wrong.
Anyway, props on the IRAC.
|