Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If by troll you mean a post where I didn't tell someone they didn't have enough evidence to support their position, or what they were posting wasn't a bug, or that it had been answered about 20 times already; there have been a couple others, but they're few and far between.
It's a direct consequence of the quality of the "bugs" posted in the bug forums. If the majority of the threads posted there were real bugs, and not the same handful of people crying about everything they want to go their way without any evidence to support them, it wouldn't be necessary.
Only you can prevent retardation in the bug forum.
|
I wouldnt say so.... We addressed Recharging (about a 15page thread with the consensus saying its WAY OP for PVP) in "Several Threads" before server launch...
One shown here..
http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...light=Recharge
It wasnt until 1 week
AFTER server launch did Red Wands get hit, and others just recently hit with it... I dont think people quite grasp the strength and or ridiculousness of "recharging" on a Pvp server... Especially with the current price set....
Golem Wands, Redwood Wands, Conflags have supposedly been addressed (cannot confirm, Conflag and or any other planar as that is not available to us yet).... There is a plethora of other rechargeables that far outweigh the cost efficiency for what they provide and or "gamebreaking" if you will pvp wise...
Again Uth,
I think the problem here has been just simply the "lack of communication"... No one knows whats being fixed, whats been fixed or whats even being looked at.....
Still in "News" is Novemember "patch notes" to be added"....
You dont owe us any of this I know, but it would most certainly allieviate the retardation threads posted every couple of minutes.... With obsurd amounts of redundancy.