View Single Post
  #164  
Old 11-23-2011, 01:57 PM
loopholbrook loopholbrook is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You didn't trump anything. This thread has been a resounding success from my perspective, from Uthgaard grammar nazi self-owning himself completely out of the thread, to softening positions of some of the more intelligent detractors (such as Lazortag) who have posted here. I largely consider the "U SUK QQ MOAR NOOB" posts to be irrelevant and I have ignored them.

Objectively speaking, the majority is irrelevant to guild naming policy. the only people's opinions who matter are Nilbog's, Rogean's, and whoever else is responsible for the guild naming policy on this server. Just because they currently don't agree with my perspective doesn't mean that they can't be persuaded. From a "classic" perspective I'm pretty sure a guild name like this would have never made it on live. What other criteria do they use?
You've gone back on what you've said twice now, and probably a third after this. Nilbog has already stated that the name doesn't need to be changed. I guess you're saying that his opinion doesn't matter? But wait, you just said that his opinion were of only two opinions that matter. So does that mean your opinion doesn't matter? Oh, only your opinion matters because you think it's right. Gotcha! I'm glad we've had this talk, I've learned a lot about you.