Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangergirl
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I made an incorrect statement of fact about mana ratios as a pillar of my theory because I compared mana ratios of equal damage spells , which admittedly was unfair to the wizzie argument. That was just the opening statement before I stated my theory. I'm sorry you are so poorly educated but that was a FACT that I stated incorrectly not a theory. My theory was the next paragraph.
"If you add in the small amount of + damage from strength buffs + the damage from damage shields (Yes wizzies get a damage shield but it is far inferior) It could be argued that Druids out DPS wizzies in grps! Add in the druid dot that is irresistible to anything within 8 levels (live) and has a 3.2 D:M at lvl 44 and you have a convincing argument!"
Don't get upset because you don't know the diff tween a Fact and theory, I admit I got the facts wrong pre 48, but I have them right post 49, and it doesn't matter anyways, 80+% of peeps reading this will roll druids over wizzies.
Also, If you quoted my whole statement, you best off read it, and if you read it and forgot what I said in it so quickly, then we know your mental capacity.
Go shoot up the post office you work at then take my advice on your new druid...115 points in wisdom :P
|
So you are saying that the fact you used as a pillar of your theory was incorrect. Well if you base a theory on a fact that is incorrect it's probably going to make that theory wrong. Now if you look at my statement from my earlier post:
"Clearly, I was speaking towards your original assertion that Wizzy and Druid damage to mana ratios on DD's are Exactly the same. Now if you had asserted that the extra utility makes up for the difference I would have said that's your prerogative to do so."
So this time in lament terms since you have trouble reading; remove the incorrect fact that the ratio's are the same as a basis for your theory. Instead start a new theory saying "if you state the difference in DPS from DD for Wizards versus DD and utility for druids, it may be close enough to be considered negligible" in your opinion. I would have considered this a personal preference and reasonable to state. The only place where I had a problem is your incorrect fact, and since we have come to the conclusion that you didn't know what you were talking about in terms of pure data, and have now been informed, feel free to use your new and reasonable theory to state why you think Druids are superior to Wizards as DPS. Ya herrrrr me?